Showing posts with label management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label management. Show all posts

Tuesday, 1 August 2017

Management part 3 - Safety and Risk

Blog post retyped as somehow, it converted itself into Greek (ish).


Incident – an untoward or unexpected event including verbal abuse and threats.
Accident – an incident that results in loss or damage like violence.
Clinical Incident – an incident occurring to a patient during or because of treatment.
Clinical Accident – a clinical incident that results in actual harm to the patient
Serious Incidents - where there is potential for learning, or high consequences to patients, families, and staff as so significant that they warrant extra resources to investigate.
Never Event - must be reported. See below.

Should be declared internally as soon as possible. Reports should be completed within 60 days. A root cause analysis should be carried out - there are three levels of this.  
- Concise, comprehensive or independent (which may take 6 months).

 

Negligible
Minor
Moderate
Major
Catastrophic

- Open and transparent
- Preventative
- Objective
- Timely and responsive
- Symptoms based
- Proportionate
- Collaborative

Check patient, and then staff are safe. Obtain and secure all evidence. Offer support to any witnesses. Identify someone to do an initial incident review, and determine level of investigation required. Inform commissioners. Contact family, and support Log on incident management
Serious incidents must be reported to the commissioner within 2 days, sooner if media / public interest.

Retained foreign object post procedure.
Giving strong K+ instead of something else
Parentally administered oral meds OD of insulin due to abbreviations or incorrect device
OD of midazolam due to wrong strength administered
Chest or neck entrapment in bedrails
ABO mismatch transfusion
Misplaced NG or OG tube
Scalding of patients

If it's moderate - severe harm --> report externally to CCG
Never Events must be AId
 - Investigate and always do root cause analysis regardless of harm to patient
 - Reported externally
 - Should be process to stop these happening

https://www.england.nhs.uk/patientsafety/serious-incident/
http://www.npsa.nhs.uk/nrls/improvingpatientsafety/patient-safety-tools-and-guidance/risk-assessment-guides/risk-matrix-for-risk-managers/

Thursday, 13 October 2016

Management part 4 - Complaints

Complaints are unfortunately comment and cost the NHS a lot in time to investigate, and litigation costs. GMC guidance says patients are allowed to complain, and their complaints must be investigated and not bias the care they are provided.
Formal complaints must be made within six months of the event, or the patient becoming aware of the event up to a maximum of a year of the event, by the patient or relative.
The trust has 3 days to acknowledge the complaint, and 25 working days to reply with a response (10 days in primary care).
Always mention PALS

There are three types of claim:
•Category A Claims: below which the trust bears the costs of any settlement (eg £20 000-250000).
•Category B Claims: claims over and above this are settled by the CNST in part (20%)
•Category C Claims: above this threshold (£500 000) settlement paid in full by CNST

To exist, medical negligence requires:
-  Duty of care existed
-  Duty was breached (Bolam/Bolitho tests)
-  Harm occurred as a result of the breach

To get compensation, a patient needs to prove:
That the treatment fell below a minimum standard of competence; and
That he/she has suffered an injury; and
That it is more likely than not that the injury would have been avoided, or less severe, with proper
treatment

 There are six main components of good complaints handling. 
1) Getting it right
2) Being customer focused
3) Being open and accountable
4) Acting fairly and proportionately
5) Putting things right
6) Seeking continuous improvement

When dealing with a complainant, the 3 Rs can be helpful.
Regret
Reason
Remedy

Complaints from GPs
This is not a complaint it's colleague to colleague
Can ring the emailer back, acknowledge mistake, praise their system and make it positive ?audit
Involve GPs in plans/ audit
Local resolution
Datix


http://michael.gradmedic.org/medicine/medicolegal.html#negligence
http://fcemprep.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/the-fcem-management-viva-basics.html?m=1 

Friday, 7 October 2016

Management Part Two - Disciplinary and Policies

·         Warnings
·         Verbal
·         Written
·         HR issues


• Grievance is an ‘Employee’s complaint’ against management.
• Discipline is a ‘Management’s complaint’ against an employee.


Clinical Issues
- Follow Trainee in Difficulty advice
- NCAS involvement may be necessary 
- An informal route may be decided on 
      Retraining, re-skilling, e.g. workshops, e-learning, 
      Counselling, rehabilitation, e.g. NHS Practitioner Health Programme
      Supervision or development support programme e.g. supervised practice, formative work-based assessments 
       Mentoring or coaching, career guidance
- If needs investigating medical director appoints case investigator. 
- Complete within four weeks 
- If need formal capability hearing, need 20 days notice, 2 members of trust board and one practitioner from outside the Trust. Advice from HR, senior Clinician from outside the trust.
-  Outcomes could be agreement for improvement, formal written warning, final written warning or dismissal. Dismissal needs to be reported to the GMC. 

Referral to the GMC
If:
a. The doctor’s ill health is posing, or may pose, a risk to patients;
b. The doctor refuses, or has failed, to follow advice and guidance from his or her own doctor, occupational health adviser or employer.
c. The doctor’s conduct has led to the involvement of the police and/or the courts or raised other concerns.

Holiday Leave
The annual entitlement under Agenda for Change for each full-time member of staff is:
On appointment              27 days + 8 General Public Holidays
After 5 years service 29 days + 8 General Public Holidays
After 10 years service 33 days + 8 General Public Holidays

Whistleblowing
If concerns speak to CD. If still have concerns anyone can speak to the board.

Management - performance related issues

The FRCEM has a whole management viva. Here are some of my notes on some of the common themes.

Working practices
Competencies’
Team work
Reliability
Guidelines / pathways
Lack of insight
Sickness
Probity
Difficult colleagues / colleagues in difficulty

Speed
Check the numbers before you speak to people about it - facts often don't reflect reality.

Trainee in Difficulty
a nationally accepted phrase used to describe:
a doctor or dentist on a postgraduate training programme, who for whatever reason, needs extra help and support - beyond that which is normally required - to deal with an issue, or issues, that threaten to impede their progress towards completion of a postgraduate training programme
The purpose of identifying a trainee as being “in difficulty” is not to label them; it is to aid the addressing of relevant issues so that they may complete training successfully and continue to contribute to the work of the NHS.
Doctor in difficulty recognises that it’s not just trainees that might be in difficulty – TID is the new term.

If a problem happens, your role initially is not to investigate. You need to ensure safety of:
The patient – go and review them
The staff – support the SHO
Support the SpR and decide if this is a doctor in difficulty.

10 Signs of a Doctor in Difficulty
- The “disappearing act” -  disappearing; lateness; frequent sick leave.
- Low work rate - leaving late and still not achieving a reasonable workload.
- Ward rage - bursts of temper; shouting matches; real or imagined slights
- Rigidity - poor tolerance of ambiguity; inability to compromise; difficulty prioritising; inappropriate ‘whistle blowing’.
- Bypass syndrome - junior colleagues or nurses find ways to avoid seeking the doctor’s opinion or help
- Career problems - difficulty with exams; uncertainty about career choice; disillusionment with medicine
- Insight failure - rejection of constructive criticism; defensiveness; counter-challenge.
- Lack of engagement in educational processes - fails to arrange appraisals, late with learning events/workbased assessments, reluctant to complete portfolio, little reflection
- Lack of initiative/appropriate professional engagement
the trainee may come from a culture where there is a rigid hierarchical structure and trainees are not encouraged to question patient management decisions by senior colleagues, or demonstrate other healthy assertive behaviours
- Inappropriate attitudes
The cultural background may be very strongly male oriented and the trainees may not be used to working with females on an equal status basis

From isolated incidents it is often difficult to know. It is important to report incidents if and when they happen so pattern can be identified.

Causes
Clinical Performance - capability and learning
Health - physical and mental
Personality and Behaviour
Environment - home and work

Management
Early identification of problems
Establish and clarify the facts, with as many sources of information as possible.
Poor performance is a symptom and not a diagnosis.
Clear documentation
Communicate misgivings. Complete records. Remedies must be sought. Progression must be delayed until issues resolved.
Patient safety greater than all

Remain focused on specific problem
Refrain from generalised comment
Deal with the specific behaviour
Try to find positive
Avoid ‘You’ and use ‘I’
Explain how you think
Wait
If facing hostility, state their feelings

Avoid confrontation
Use empathic assertion
Active listening
Control anger
Let their anger subside



When to refer to the GMC 
If the Drs illness is impacting his or her performance, and one or more of:
  Drs ill health is posing, or may pose, a risk to patients
  Dr refuses or has failed to follow advice and guidance from his or her own patients, occy health or employer.
 Drs conduct has lead to the involvement of the police/ and or the courts or raised other concerns.
Discuss potential referrals with GMC or NCAS first.

References
http://stemlynsblog.org/overconfidence-in-the-ed/